|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L.A. Tool & Die
|
| In Stock On: |
|
Mar 20, 2002 |
| Produced in: |
|
United States
|
| Studio: |
|
His Video
|
| Year: |
|
1979 |
| Directed by: |
|
Joe Gage
|
| Cast: |
|
Bob Blount, Casey Donovan, Johnny Falconberg, Michael Kearns, Paul Baressi, Richard Locke, The Gage Men, Will Seagers
|
| Length: |
|
88 min |
| Language: |
|
English |
| Themes: |
|
Real Men / Daddies, Pre-Condom, Classics, Blue Collar Workers
|
|
| Average Member Rating: |
|
|
Synopsis:
The third film in the trilogy, (the first being Kansas City Trucking Co., and the second El Paso Wrecking Corp.), this film is more of the best stuff from the first two. No condoms. You don't get to see them like this anymore. It's a real trip.
|
|
Review:
Will be reviewed soon.
|
| 2
out of 2 people found
the following review helpful: |
|
by
Blknyc
Dec 7, 2005
|
| Pre-Condom Action At Its Best |
| Of the three movies in this Joe Gage series, this by far is the best one. There are more men in this one, the number of sex scenes have increased, and there is more just good old fashioned sucking and fucking, real men having real male sex. |
|
|
| 0
out of 0 people found
the following review helpful: |
|
Dec 15, 2003
|
| Great Classic |
| This film made me cum at least 3 times. Very hot film. |
|
|
| 0
out of 0 people found
the following review helpful: |
|
by
Jeff
Apr 1, 2010
|
| The best of the big 3 |
| The best of the big 3, including Kansas City Trucking Co and El Paso Wrecking Corp. This one is by far the best. The filming is better, and it has the usual hairy, older, non-twink manly studs. Couple of really great scenes, especially the rape scene when the guy is handcuffed to a tree, and the orgy scene in the back of the van. Sex scenes are short and not looped which make for a less boring repeat of stuff you've already seen. Good choice for those who like vintage! |
|
|
| 1
out of 1 people found
the following review helpful: |
|
by
Shawn Rose
May 5, 2004
|
| LA Tool |
| All I can say is I first saw this on a VHS tape when I was 16, and it was the first gay porn I ever saw. And it still makes my cock hard and makes me cum. Woof! I think the men in the porn biz in the late 70's and early 80's seem to be more masculine than the ones today. But I would trade places with any actor in this film; there are some hot sex scenes. Just take into consideration that this was done years ago and technalogy has advanced, so it is a bit old fashioned, and sometimes the lighting is not good, but hey, it is the pioneer of gay videos. You'll enjoy it, I think. |
|
|
| 0
out of 0 people found
the following review helpful: |
|
by
EQJ
Jan 3, 2010
|
| Oh stop complaining! |
| Porn was different then. This is hot. No, I don't like seeing pussy anymore than anyone else, and that bearded guy in this movie and El Paso Wrecking Corp., Hank, does nothing for me. Yes, it moves slowly, the music is bad, and the bodies are unshaven. But dude, the music IS bad and the bodies ARE unshaven! They handcuff a man to a tree and then fuck the hell out of him. How many times have you fantasized about just that? The guy with the beard and the bad bleach job is hot, hot, hot. Enjoy. |
|
|
| 0
out of 0 people found
the following review helpful: |
|
by
Chicago
Aug 12, 2003
|
| None like this any more..... |
There are two reasons to love this film. It isn't like any porn in the last 20 years. There's plot (whether you like it or not), there's some male/female sex (again, like it or not), and the sound is all dubbed moans and groans and some background "filler" noise. Sort of a history lesson for porn, like watching some old silent movies is to watching "Gladiator". BUT The sex in this film is awesome. Starting with the first scene, where this hot guy smirks at the camera as he swallows another guy's dick and lets it explode all over his face and in his mouth. Richard Locke is one very sexy, dick-hungry man. And his love interest (Paul Baressi) somehow innocently smoulders. Didn't expect to want to watch this film over and over again, but I kept hitting the "back" button on the DVD remote, and didn't hit the "fast forward" at all. |
|
|
| 0
out of 0 people found
the following review helpful: |
|
by
jack richards
Jun 19, 2003
|
| Hot sex/too much plot |
| The sex in this video is great. The actors are "naturally fit" and good looking. There's some hot group action, and the film opens with a scene in which a guy is giving head and the cock explodes, then he swallows it again, and later a whole group cums on his face. But it suffers from the same need to have a plot as most videos from that period. |
|
|
| 0
out of 0 people found
the following review helpful: |
|
Apr 25, 2003
|
|
| I like this movie because the story is great. The lighting is great. The picture is clear. This movie has a lot of short scenes. There is one straight scene in this movie. The straight scene is between Paul Baressi and a girl. It is the only scene where the actor uses a condom. The story is about a man who falls in love with another man he met at the bar. He goes all the way to L.A. Tool & Die to find him. At the end they make love in the van. There are some group scenes in this movie. It is a good movie for a classic. |
|
|
| 0
out of 0 people found
the following review helpful: |
|
by
Oliver Flores
Jun 10, 2004
|
| Not worth the hype |
| There wasn't enough fucking in this movie. Some of the scenes were awfully dark. I didn't like how there was a straight sex scene in the middle of the film. A woman is the last thing I want to see when trying to get off. |
|
|
| 0
out of 0 people found
the following review helpful: |
|
Dec 6, 2002
|
| L.A. Tool & Die |
| We've come a long way in porn! This movie is in major need of a remake. All of the story lines are great, what is laking is the direction and film quality. Each scene is quick and not fluid. Just when you think you are really going to get into it, the scene is over. The sound is awful especially in the coach/father scene. The two reasons I rented this movie were, 1- it's suppose to be a classic, and 2- condomless which I love to watch and wonder what that must be like! I say pass on this "classic" and be thankful for the talent of today's producers and directors! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|